For many businesses, the ability to manage, store and process big data effectively could mean the difference between...
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
being on top and being forgotten. And when it comes to processing big data in the cloud, users have two popular choices: MapReduce vs. Spark. Both are distributed processing systems that work well with large volumes of data, especially when data does not readily fit within the constraints of a single server.
Before looking at options for running these big data frameworks in the public cloud, let's look at the basic differences when comparing MapReduce vs. Spark.
MapReduce was the first processing framework released with Hadoop, an open source framework for processing large data sets. As its name suggests, MapReduce is based on the functional programming concepts of mapping and reducing. A map operation applies a function to an argument, and outputs a result in the form of a key value pair. A common example is counting words in a book. For each occurrence of a word in a book, a map function, known as a mapper, takes a word as input and emits a key value pair, consisting of the word, which is the key, and the number 1, which is the value. A reducer function then collects all the key value pairs with the same key -- or, in this example, the same word -- and sums the values.
MapReduce works well for batch-oriented processes. The MapReduce framework uses persistent storage on nodes in the cluster to store results, so the high level of I/O can introduce latencies. As a result, MapReduce is a good choice for very large data sets that are processed in batches.
Apache Spark is an open source, distributed computing platform. It runs on Hadoop, as well as Mesos, and you can use its own cluster manager. Spark works similarly to MapReduce, but it keeps big data in memory, rather than writing intermediate results to disk. Because of this, Spark applications can run a great deal faster than MapReduce jobs, and provide more flexibility.
When evaluating MapReduce vs. Spark, consider your options for using both frameworks in the public cloud. For example, Amazon Web Services Elastic MapReduce (EMR) includes support for Spark. MapReduce is included with the base Hadoop installation on EMR. Microsoft Azure also offers MapReduce and Spark in its HDInsight service. Google Dataproc, currently in beta, is a managed Hadoop service that offers MapReduce, as well as Spark.
Five quick links for big data management in the cloud
Considerations for using Hadoop in the cloud
Choosing the best cloud model for your big data needs
Dig Deeper on Big data and cloud business intelligence
Dan Sullivan asks:
How did you decide between MapReduce vs. Spark for big data processing in the cloud?
0 ResponsesJoin the Discussion
Related Q&A from Dan Sullivan
Docker's recent upgrade introduced support for hardware signing and in the future, automated security analysis on Docker images. Expert Dan Sullivan ...continue reading
Cisco's new project Contiv automates operational policies for containerized applications in the cloud. Expert Dan Sullivan explains the benefits of ...continue reading
Dropbox API abused by attackers posing as legitimate users in a huge spear phishing campaign. Expert Dan Sullivan explains how to mitigate the risks ...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.